Cesar,
No. I had proposed something last summer, but I haven't had time to work on
it. Peter Goldstein has done some work on it, and I just received a drop of
his code. If I get a chance on the weekend, I'll try to post up some of his
extensions. That will all occur in james-dev, not here.
Today, you can block messages based upon DNSRBL and those other
characteristics, but only after they have been transfered.
--- Noel
-----Original Message-----
From: Cesar Bonadio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 17:18
To: James Users List
Subject: Re: Mailet processing order
Noel,
This is just what I need, do you have any description/docs about it maybe I
could start working with that.
Today we have a system that receives messages from internet running Postfix
but we plan to switch to James as soon as we can block the messages based on
IP address MAPS RBL and MAIL FROM: and RCPT TO.
[]s
----- Original Message -----
From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 6:59 PM
Subject: RE: Mailet processing order
> Casar,
>
> My expectation is that it will be based upon remote address, MAIL FROM and
> RCPT TO fields. The filters will be educated by mailets, so that once you
> determine that you want to short circuit based upon one of those criteria,
> you can. I don't expect that we'll do any processing of the DATA stream
> prior to the processor pipeline.
>
> --- Noel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cesar Bonadio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 16:47
> To: James Users List
> Subject: Re: Mailet processing order
>
>
> > For James v3 there is likely to be some form of short circuit
> > disconnect, but probably not to the extent that you would do
> > virus detection during smtp transport processing
>
> Anything that could expose IP address and Envelope recipients should be
> more than enough to block the bad messages, any other header or body
> message can be filtered using regular mailets.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "James Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 6:38 PM
> Subject: RE: Mailet processing order
>
>
> > > the mailet code is processed after the message is complete
> > > received
> >
> > Correct.
> >
> > > I will only be able to block the message after receiving
> > > the full message.
> >
> > Correct.
> >
> > > is there any way to execute a mailet before the full
> > > message is received?
> >
> > No.
> >
> > For James v3 there is likely to be some form of short circuit
> > disconnect, but probably not to the extent that you would do
> > virus detection during smtp transport processing.
> >
> > --- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
