Pierpaolo Fumagalli wrote:
>
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> >
> > No, the problem is that Servlets = HTTPServlet. If we change the name to
> > "mailets" of shit like that, this will _always_ be the case.
> >
> > Anyway, if we precisely outline the differences between the two models,
> > it's going to be easier to _merge_ them in the future because more and
> > more people will understand their similarities and differences.
> >
> > I think servlet is a protocol abstract name. Servlet = httpServlet is
> > wrong. We should not fail to provide better alternatives to this
> > reasoning, since we can.
>
> At this point in time? I can't care less...
> I spent the first two months of my permanence in the US discussing @ Sun
> about mailservlets.... And let me say... I give up...
> No more time, zero interest and no will to keep banging on a wall...
> Sorry... I'm burned out...
I will not propose we use javax.servlet.smtp, that's too much. I just
ask we use the term "mail servlet" to expose our ideas using common
patterns.
Me too have zero interest in banging my head on the wall for this, but
Sun doesn't hold a trademark on the servlet name... so...
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Come to the first official Apache Software Foundation Conference!
------------------------- http://ApacheCon.Com ---------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
