Totally agree.
We just don't need this "flexibility".
Roberto
-----Messaggio Originale-----
Da: Federico Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A: Java Apache Mail Server <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Data invio: venerd� 5 maggio 2000 23.10
Oggetto: Re: Is the pipe processor enought?
>
>
> Dino Fancellu wrote:
> >
> > > you can use
> > > <mailet name=RemoteDelivery class=RemoteDelivery>
> > > ...
> > > </mailet>
> > >
> > > this is no problem but the point of using name is:
> > > 1 take mailet configurations out of the sitemap
> > > 2 allow a single instance of a mailet to appear in two pr more
> > > places in the sitemap
> > >
> > > So you have to name a class even if it is the only instance of that
> > > class...
> > >
> > > Fede
> >
> > I know, that seems cumbersome.
> >
> > I should be able to have config in the sitemap if I want it, or
elsewhere.
> > Don't force us to choose.
> >
> > If I make a ref to an unknown instance it should just try to create an
> > instance of that class.
>
> This looks to me like "flexibility syndrom"...
> forcing only references instead of instances is a way to keep confs
> ordered and avoid to have configs in two different palces which may mess
> things up.
>
> What is the purpose of doing things in two ways is one is enought? Just
> confusion.
>
> Fede
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
