I'm wondering if the line feed problems are a function of running it on
Linux. We might have to use a different line feed reader/writer for the
commands as we've had no problems with this when JAMES is running on Linux.
I am planning to move JAMES to our production incoming mail server this
week. I've mapped out the mailets I have to write to handle our listservs
and other intricacies, but have to get a spare moment to write these out.
The code that JAMES is based on is what we're using right now as our
incoming mail server, and has been for over a year. So the underlying
communication for receiving emails from a variety of servers should be
pretty robust. I'll let you know how it goes.
Serge Knystautas
Loki Technologies
http://www.lokitech.com/
----- Original Message -----
From: Charles Benett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 5:28 PM
Subject: Feedback from Newbie
> Hi!
> I had tried using james-1.0b2 a few weeks ago, but it was pretty hard
> going. Came back from holiday and have just tried 1.1b1 - a major
> improvement. Congratulations!
>
> Two comments:
> 1) The run.sh in the dist is out of date and has a formatting problem
> (unexpected end-of-file error), so Linux users need to read run.bat and
> adapt as required.
> 2) James seems to add an extra fullstop on the end of the last line of
> text in the body of a message. This happens using both Netscape
> Communicator and by telneting onto port 25.
>
> A question:
> I know someone is using JAMES for outbound mail in a production or near
> production environment (from archives) but is anyone using James for
> inbound mail handling in a production environment yet?
>
> Thanks,
> Charles
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/james%40list.working-dogs.com/>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/james%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]