>�From: Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>�Date: Fri Aug 25 21:02:52 EDT 2000
>
> I don't run James yet and I am not aware of any particular test cases (if I
> knew I would prolly be fixing it :P). Hopefully I will be setting up a dns
> server soon and be able to play with a few machines - in which case I
> should be able to fix it up or at least give machines to test on :P
Well, if there's no tests to show that the DNS code isn't working, I have to again
state that I don't think there's anything wrong with it. I was kind of confused to
hear that hotmail.com and other domains might have problems... our outgoing JAMES mail
server has delivered to hotmail.com and other large ISPs with complex message
routing/DNS configurations.
I feel pretty confident that the DNS code is stable, and in fact, even while I believe
the JNDI implementation of DNS is preferable long term as it is using a standard,
JavaSoft's implementation has been available for a lot less time (the DNS library
we're using is about 1.5 years old), and the DNS library we're using has been used in
other Java written mail servers for this same purpose, as well as Java written DNS
servers.
Serge Knystautas
Loki Technologies
http://www.lokitech.com/
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/james%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
