----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Benett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: Proposal subtree in cvs
> Woops, guess I wasn't clear enough first time.
>
> Branching is a bit more heavy-duty than the method I was proposing. I
> meant to have, in parallel to lib and src (etc) a proposal directory, in
> the current branch of CVS. The code in the proposal directory would not
> be built automatically, you would move it into src if you wanted to try
> it. This avoids branching for every proposal. This is similar to the
> organisation within Avalon's main branch.
>
> If we need to branch to bug-fix a release, we could do that now, but we
> could wait until we needed to and then do a retroactive branch. (Which
> is how we unearthed the version of avalon used in James).
>
> Does that make more sense?
> Charles
Works for me. +1
Serge Knystautas
Loki Technologies
http://www.lokitech.com/
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/james%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
