Peter, Were you talking about Sun's DNS provider for JNDI or something
else?
Charles
Peter Donald wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> You may wish to update to new javadns. It is lot less "featurefull" and in
> fact I haven't found any bugs with it yet. It is also much easier to use
> for some uses. ie to look up MX records you simply use
>
> final String resolvers[] = new String[] { "131.172.4.1", "131.172.2.2" };
> dns.setResolver( new ExtendedResolver( resolvers ) );
> final Record mxRecords[] = dns.getRecords( site, Type.MX );
>
> So far I haven't had any problems and I have been using it in my main mail
> relay for a bit. You may want to give it a whirl. It would also reduce the
> codebase size of James which is always a good thing :P
>
> Cheers,
>
> Pete
>
> *------------------------------------------------------*
> | "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want |
> | to test a man's character, give him power." |
> | -Abraham Lincoln |
> *------------------------------------------------------*
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/james%40list.working-dogs.com/>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/james%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
