Peter Donald wrote:
>
> >I'm keen to move JAMES to the new Avalon as soon as practical. My only
> >hesitation is: how stable is new Avalon and how long will porting take?
> >It may make more sense for a release of JAMES1.2, principally Serge's
> >new mailet api, which I think is pretty close, then transfer to new
> >Avalon.
> >Thoughts?
>
> Stability wise (as in performance) it is fairly stable. A lot more stable
> than past versions. It does a lot more error checking - thou a badly
> written thread can still screw it it should be much more safer. FWIW my
> mailserver ran for about 810 hours without fault before I pulled it down.
>
> If you mean stability as in interface wise then it is mostly stable (except
> for Manageable interface). Thou it may be better to release 1.2 as is and
> then upgrade over a few weeks and release again (better publicity) ;)
>
Ups... I'll fix Manageable asap (now).
> Cheers,
>
> Pete
Federico Barbieri
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/james%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
