----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Benett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Yes, I think we should be close. I suggest we go for feature freeze
> soon, then allow a few days for testing (bug fixes only) before release.
> Thoughts?
Thanks for cleaning up the bumps. I'm glad Stuart is testing the build
process as a new user as it's giving good feedback (which I'll try to
incorporate into some docs for those building from CVS). I'm going to
continue testing the exception handling in the processor tonight... I'm
planning to put JAMES 1.2 in place of our existing incoming mail server
tonight (hopefully), so I want to be sure that even if something in JAMES
dies, it continues to receive messages.
How about Wednesday we branch for the 1.2 release and start packaging up a
distribution (assuming you have no problems with LDAP tomorrow). I'll work
on the documentation more tonight and tomorrow. Hopefully we'll have it
pretty easy to use, and then can announce it to a bunch of java sites.
Serge Knystautas
Loki Technologies
http://www.lokitech.com/
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/james%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
