Serge Knystautas wrote:
>
> Stuart,
>
> Thanks for the patch. I actually had to make a slight change to make sure
> the hashCode is the same for two addresses even if their domain name is of
> different cases (lokitech.com and LOKITECH.COM should produce the same
> hashCode).
>
> Actually I also changed MailAddress to be case-insensitive for the
> username/local part as well. I had been wondering how to make JAMES
> optionally be case-sensitive or case-insensitive for usernames, and I'm
> starting to wonder whether this is worth doing. As long as JAMES doesn't
> alter the case as messages are sent through, I'm thinking it's fine if JAMES
> treats usernames as case-insensitive. Any objections?
>
+1 for case-insensitive. Having the option would be even better, but
case-insensitive beats the current always case-sensitive.
Charles
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/james%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
