At 04:13 18/1/01 -0500, Craig W. Blake wrote:
>If you are asking if there is any advantage to hosting multiple domain
>names on one IP (and therefore one instance of JAMES), then yes. Many
>companies, including mine, are being severly limited in the number of IPs
>they are allowed to "rent," and have to resort to virtual hosting.
>Luckily, this is exceedingly easy in Apache, and some commercial mail
>servers. AFAIK the best way to do this is by adding a suffix to the
>username when logging in for POP3 or IMAP (i.e. user.domain) and
>discriminating incoming mail by domain name (this is how NTMail works). I
>think this is a pretty valuable feature for a business class mail server,
>and should (eventually) make it's way into JAMES. What do you all think?
+1
;)
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof." |
| - John Kenneth Galbraith |
*-----------------------------------------------------*
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/james%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
