--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "randhir_nag" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Very eficient and to the point answer.arigatou gozaimasu.
> However there are some usages which are new to me
> 1.daibun no shukudai - in which capacity is 'no' being used here.How 
> would grammatically sumarize this usage of 'no'?> 

"No" is usually a genitive particle and it is used in a variety of 
ways, many of which have no exact equivalent in English. 

Suzuki-san no shachoo = "Mr. Suzuki, the company boss"
Sensei no kuruma = "the teacher's car"
Bokura no tsukutta tabemono = "The food we prepared"
Watashi no kaita anata e no tegami = "The letter I wrote to you"
Ame ga furu no wo misete = "Show me where it's raining"

In this case, it serves as a modifying auxiliary. The meaning 
of "daibun no shukudai" is "a lot of homework" ["handful" + gen. part. 
+ "homework" = "a handful of homework"].

> 2.eigo o oshiemasu kara(node) - dont both of them refer to becasue?>

"Kara" is used at the end of a sentence to mean "because". Usually 
applied to afterthough sentences when used in this fashion. When used 
in the middle of a sentence, it means "after". For example, "Sakana-ya 
e haitta kara, ikutsuka no tai wo nusumimashita" = "After he entered 
the fish market, he stole a few bream."

Japanese is left-branching, so when you see anything functioning as a 
modifier, it will always come right before the modified term. 
 
> 3.koto ga dekimasen - does this mean that dekimasen should never be 
> used in isolation?> 

Usually not. "Dekiru" means "to be able to do something" and it's 
usually applied when referring to the potential of a person or thing to 
execute a task. Even so, there are instances when "dekiru" is used in 
one for or another by itself. For example, "dekikanemasu" is a formal 
term meaning "it cannot be done". It sounds rather cold, so exercise 
caution when using it.

> 4.Kono hon wo yomu koto wa - 'no wa' can also be used here?> 

"No" means "the one" in this sentence. So "no" is being used as a noun 
and thus takes "wa" as topical particle. ["this" + "book" + dir. obj. 
part. + "read" + "abstract thing" + topic part. = Regarding the reading 
of this book,...]

I would advise you not to compare grammar between English and Japanese. 
They are very different in their function as well as their appearance. 
Usually looking at how a word functions in the grammar of the target 
language helps greatly in arriving at more accurate translations. Thus 
I tend to consider myself a "structuralist" of sorts.

- Arian I.



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Japanese_Language/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Japanese_Language/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to