We should stop scanning on every RET instruction
Signed-off-by: Tomek Grabiec <tgrab...@gmail.com>
---
jit/subroutine.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/jit/subroutine.c b/jit/subroutine.c
index bbfad16..e831d17 100644
--- a/jit/subroutine.c
+++ b/jit/subroutine.c
@@ -333,11 +333,12 @@ static int do_subroutine_scan(struct
subroutine_scan_context *ctx,
ctx->visited_code[pc]++;
- if (bc_is_ret(&c[pc]) &&
- bc_get_ret_index(&c[pc]) == ctx->sub->ret_index) {
- if (ctx->sub->end_pc == PC_UNKNOWN ||
- pc > ctx->sub->end_pc)
- ctx->sub->end_pc = pc;
+ if (bc_is_ret(&c[pc])) {
+ if (bc_get_ret_index(&c[pc]) == ctx->sub->ret_index &&
+ (ctx->sub->end_pc == PC_UNKNOWN ||
+ pc > ctx->sub->end_pc))
+ ctx->sub->end_pc = pc;
+
return 0;
}
--
1.6.0.6
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Jatovm-devel mailing list
Jatovm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jatovm-devel
