Vegard Nossum wrote: > 2009/9/5 Pekka Enberg <penb...@cs.helsinki.fi>: >> On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 16:06 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote: >>> Um, wait, what's the actual dereference that causes the valgrind >>> warning? Because as it stands, it looks like you're fixing just the >>> symptom and not the real error. We have method initializers that >>> should take care of initializing everything, field by field. I'd think >>> that's where you'd fix it. >> As you can see in the valgrind trace, the problem comes from: >> >> cu->stack_frame = alloc_stack_frame( >> method->args_count, >> method->code_attribute.max_locals); >> >> which means ->code_attribute.max_locals is not initialized. Looking at >> cafebabe, I don't see any guarantees that everything will be >> initialized. > > That's probably because there is no code attribute to begin with, in > which case we should not be preparing the method for jit..?
Good point. I wonder why we have methods without code attribute in classfiles. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Jatovm-devel mailing list Jatovm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jatovm-devel
