Static is much better?
Hmm, I can't point to this as hard evidance but I do know when I compiled
apache with DSO support for all modules it sure seemed to run much smoother.
That is its runnig far faster than it did with the out of the can config.
But what jon says makes alot of sense as it must require more resources to
support all the connecting code. Strange, no?
Ron Burton
jon * wrote:
> > The configure scripts ran fine, but I still got the same error when I tried
> > to run make. I there a file generated by configure that I could look
> > at to help diagnose this problem?
> > --Paul
>
> not that i know of...
>
> one question though (that unfortunately doesn't solve your problem), why are
> you building for DSO? static is a much better option.
>
> -jon
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html/>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
