> If we ask them, why don't we go for relaxing the licensing, too?
been there, done that. they are well aware of the issues and are working on
it. (and i'm on their ass about it as well).
> Also, I thought 2.1 was going to be part of the JDK 1.2.
> Is that not the case?
nope...2.0 was briefly in the 1.2b3 release but was pulled. would you want
the JSDK to have the same release cycles as the JDK? i thought so.
-jon
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
READ THE FAQ!!!! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
