Mark Foster wrote:
>
> In our particular case, jserv is more attractive because the memory
> footprint of the server processes is much smaller, meaning a single head-end
> can handle as much as 6 or 7 times as many connections. This means less
> head-ends are required to match our traffic load, which saves the company
> money, etc.
I'm sensing a huge logic flaw here.. since when does process size
directly correlate to system capacity or transactions/second?
-dsp
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
READ THE FAQ!!!! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
