---------------------------------------------------------------- BEFORE YOU POST, search the faq at <http://java.apache.org/faq/> WHEN YOU POST, include all relevant version numbers, log files, and configuration files. Don't make us guess your problem!!! ---------------------------------------------------------------- On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, David Rees wrote: > Anyway, the IBM JDK seems to work wonderfully for me, with only one > drawback: Compiling with the IBM JDK seems to take at least twice as > long, so I compile/test with Blackdown, and then run under the IBM JDK. > Why not try using Jikes as your compiler with the IBM JDK? -Greg- -- -------------------------------------------------------------- Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- ibm 118 vs. blackdown 117_v3 Brad Chesman
- Re: ibm 118 vs. blackdown 117_v3 Michael Amster
- Re: ibm 118 vs. blackdown 117_v3 Glen Newton
- Re: ibm 118 vs. blackdown 117_v3 Urban Widmark
- Re: ibm 118 vs. blackdown 117_v3 Dan Milstein
- Re: ibm 118 vs. blackdown 117_v3 Pascal Chong
- Re: ibm 118 vs. blackdown 117_v3 Rupert H�lsey
- Re: ibm 118 vs. blackdown 117_v3 Henri Yandell
- Re: ibm 118 vs. blackdown 117_v3 David Rees
- Re: ibm 118 vs. blackdown 117_v... Greg Ritter
- Re: ibm 118 vs. blackdown 117_v3 Pierpaolo Fumagalli
- Re: ibm 118 vs. blackdown 117_v... Urban Widmark
- Re: ibm 118 vs. blackdown 1... Pierpaolo Fumagalli
- Re: ibm 118 vs. blackdo... Henri Yandell
- Re: ibm 118 vs. blackdo... Pierpaolo Fumagalli
- RE: ibm 118 vs. blackdown 117_v3 Terence Kwan
- Re: ibm 118 vs. blackdown 117_v3 Jacob Robert Wilkins
- Re: ibm 118 vs. blackdown 117_v... Brad Chesman
- Re: ibm 118 vs. blackdown 1... Jacob Robert Wilkins
- RE: ibm 118 vs. blackdown 117_v3 Jim Richards
