----------------------------------------------------------------
BEFORE YOU POST, search the faq at <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
WHEN YOU POST, include all relevant version numbers, log files,
and configuration files. Don't make us guess your problem!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------
JServ is considerably faster on all our systems. These are SuSE Linux and
Windows NT 4 systems. PII, Celeron and PIII's , 128 - 512MB RAM. The only
reason I can see right now for running Tomcat is if you need JSDK >2.0.
We have not done any structured testing so you could consider my words as
worthless hearsay, but it is my view.
As I remember there is a mention in the Tomcat docs stating it is not
tweaked for performance yet.. maybe check them also.
Chris
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000 00:59:48 -0400, Tim Bass wrote:
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>BEFORE YOU POST, search the faq at <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
>WHEN YOU POST, include all relevant version numbers, log files,
>and configuration files. Don't make us guess your problem!!!
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>Hi.
>
>Guess this is a dumb question; but given the
>same modern linux platform; are JSP and servlets
>served faster using a standalone tomcat-jakarta
>or jserv with apache? Or should the performance
> be the same?
>
>Thanks.
>
>-Tim
>
>
>
>--
>--------------------------------------------------------------
>Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
>To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Search Archives:
><http://www.mail-archive.com/java-apache-users%40list.working-dogs.com/>
>Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search Archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/java-apache-users%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
