----------------------------------------------------------------
BEFORE YOU POST, search the faq at <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
WHEN YOU POST, include all relevant version numbers, log files,
and configuration files.  Don't make us guess your problem!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------

1) The tomcat mod_jserv is not the JServ mod_jserv; it is being phased out
   and will be replaced by mod_jk

2) To understand the differences in how you _deploy_ servlet apps between
   JServ and Tomcat, you must read the Sun Servlet spec papers available
   on java.sun.com --- it seems bizarre and crazy at first, but once you
   understand it, there is method to their madness (except that you cannot
   subclass applications?)

3) If you need to use features of JSDK 2.1, you can use GnuJSP --- this
   package contains some work-arounds that implement 2.1 features in the
   2.0 framework.

4) From what I can tell with my limited testing, Tomcat 3.1 is stable enough
   for production, but there are so many changes in 3.2 that it does not
   make much sense to devote the time on 3.1's api.  3.2 is behaving quite
   well for us in test trials.  

5) What is missing for production, however, is any sort of
   installation/user guide --- there are guides in the kit, but they are
   such a jumble of 3.1+3.2 you cannot tell what is true and what is
   obsolete. Let this be a lesson to document writers that you should use
   DocBook and use element attributes to clearly mark version dependencies! ;)

-- 
Gary Lawrence Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TeleDynamics Communications Inc
Business Innovations Through Open Source Systems: http://www.teledyn.com
"Computers are useless.  They can only give you answers."(Pablo Picasso)



--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search Archives: 
<http://www.mail-archive.com/java-apache-users%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to