On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Deepal Jayasinghe <[email protected]>wrote:
> Now I remember why we introduce this jar feature. As you might know > single POJO deployment has few drawbacks: > - can have single class > - cannot have a package name > - cannot refer to any other classes > > To overcome these problem one can deploy a POJO as a jar file, but > need to annotate the service class using JSR181 (@WebService). Which > helps them to deploy services without worrying to write services.xml. > Currently we can't deploy JSR 181 annotated services in the "services" folder. That functionality has been removed long time ago. So this kind of an annotated POJO should be deployed in the "servicejars" folder. Therefore, supporting .jar files for AAR services is no longer useful. Thanks, ~Isuru > Hence, I still think this has a valid use case, in fact and no problem > of keeping it. > > Deepal > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Srinath Perera <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am +1 on removing, way to get good usability is to do what is > > advertised, no more, no less. > > --Srinath > > > > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Deepal Jayasinghe <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I would not worry about having jar support since that does not break > anything. > >> > >> Deepal > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Isuru Suriarachchi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> In the current Axis2 trunk, even if I rename a .aar file in the > >>> repository/services folder to .jar, it is getting deployed as a .aar > file. > >>> This happens because of the following code in the DeploymentFileData > class. > >>> > >>> public static boolean isServiceArchiveFile(String filename) { > >>> return ((filename.endsWith(".jar")) | > (filename.endsWith(".aar"))); > >>> } > >>> > >>> So do we need to support .jar files as well? I can remember that we > >>> supported JAX-WS services also in the "repository/services" folder > before it > >>> was moved into "servicejars". Is this code something left from that > >>> implementation or is this intensional? Shouldn't we remove the support > for > >>> .jar extension? > >>> > >>> WDYT? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> ~Isuru > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Technical Lead, > >>> WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.org/ > >>> Blog : http://isurues.wordpress.com/ > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> http://blogs.deepal.org > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > ============================ > > Srinath Perera, Ph.D. > > Senior Software Architect, WSO2 Inc. > > Visiting Lecturer, University of Moratuwa > > Member, Apache Software Foundation > > Research Scientist, Lanka Software Foundation > > Blog: http://srinathsview.blogspot.com/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > -- > http://blogs.deepal.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Technical Lead, WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.org/ Blog : http://isurues.wordpress.com/
