Hi Yonik, I'm interested, but I didn't see any files attached. Not sure if it's at my end or the mailing list. Is there another way I can get these files? Thanks
-Chris On 4/14/05, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, so I implemented an UnscoredRangeQuery we needed for use with > lucene 1.4.3. Seems to work fine for me, so I thought I would put it > out here to see what you guys think... (files attached) > > Would a cleaned up version be useful for some version of Lucene, or > will all the current work that Paul is doing in the queries & scorers > make this method obsolete? > > Scoring seems an order of magnitude more complex than analysis and > finding terms & docs. I'd appreciate guidance or suggestions related > to scoring and what numbers I'm currently returning (as long as it > doesn't slow things down much). > > Features: > - can handle any number of terms... doesn't expand to a boolean query > - can be used anywhere in a normal query hierarchy (unlike RangeFilter) > - can be open ended on both ends > - endpoints can be independently inclusive or exclusive > - produces a constant score for each hit (could be a mis-feature also...) > > MisFeatures: > - no skipTo()... it currently impersonates a BooleanQuery because of > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34407 > - no per-doc scoring (a small constant is returned). we don't have > any range queries where scoring makes sense, and it's faster without > it. > > -Yonik > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
