DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34930>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34930 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #15043|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-24 05:59 ------- Created an attachment (id=15137) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15137&action=view) Patch that hopefully is what Doug means Doug, I could not resolve in my mind exactly what you meant in your example code snippet, but here's a patch that I believe accomplishes the same thing. It's merely a renaming of the variable, and using the 'mergeSegement decrements' concept that you mention which I think is a good idea. This patch still doesn't speed up the actual detecting of what segments on the stack to merge when it does go into that loop. I need to re-baseline the performance measurements with this patch to see where the CPU is now spending most of it's time, as it it may now be somewhere else entirely. NOTE: all current unit tests still pass with this patch. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
