DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35037>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35037 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-24 22:47 ------- Daniel, you are correct that the cost of the exception catching is only incurred if the exception is actually thrown. I was a bit stunned to see this crop up in performance analysis. See Bug 34930 where some performance profiling highlights this area as one of the higher CPU consumers, so it _must_ be getting called. now over a large Document set being indexed, if it is invoked quite a bit, it ends up causing a reasonable impact on the overall timeline for indexing. Isn't the proposed patch a better way to do the same thing even if it's NOT called that often? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]