Yep, if one would set -Xmx32m memory consumption would of course be
different. So it's really a "discovery" of the (default) Sun JVM gc
policy rather than anything Lucene specific.
It seems that benchmark results sometimes reflect more a person's
familiarity (or lack thereof) with a tool rather than anything else.
Oh well,
Wolfgang.
On Jun 1, 2005, at 3:07 PM, Daniel Naber wrote:
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 04:41, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
http://www.zedshaw.com/projects/ruby_odeum/performance.html
Here's a follow up:
http://www.zedshaw.com/projects/ruby_odeum/odeum_lucene_part2.html
Now the claim is that Lucene is faster than Ruby/Odeum but it takes 36
times more memory. However, I cannot find any information on how
exactly
Lucene was started. It's no surprise that Java requires much memory
and
doesn't clean up if it never comes close to the limit set with -Xmx.
Regards
Daniel
--
http://www.danielnaber.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
