I remember adding some of those, and I don't really recall why I was adding them. I think we just didn't have various setters we have now, and for some reason chose not to add them. Now that we have (most of them?), I think system properties can go.
Otis --- Daniel Naber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > there's a bug report (#34359) asking to catch and ignore access > exceptions > when reading system properties so Lucene can be used in an applet. I > wanted to apply that patch, but now I'm not sure anymore: does it > make > sense for Lucene to read settings from system properties? Shouldn't > that > be left to the application that uses Lucene? There are set... calls > for > most of these settings, so it's trivial to implement this for a user > of > Lucene. > > Regards > Daniel > > -- > http://www.danielnaber.de > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
