[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-101?page=all ]

Erik Hatcher updated LUCENE-101:
--------------------------------

    Bugzilla Id:   (was: 18934)
      Component: Analysis
                     (was: Other)
    Description: 
Moved from todo.xml:

Now we rewrite parts of Lucene code in order to use another analyzer. It will 
be useful to select analyzer without touching code.

This was orginally request by Kazuhiro Kazama ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) in

http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=lucene-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgId=338928

Not sure if this was completed to Kazuhiro Kazama's satisfaction in the current 
CVS. We can certainly choose which analyzer to use for a given IndexWriter and 
QueryParser it sounded like he was asking for something like a factory the 
would create an analyzer based on a locale but unless I don't understand things 
quite right, searching an index with any analyzer that you didn't create the 
index with is bound to cause you to have false hits in your results.

Perhaps this is fixed or no action should be taken. Can someone with a better 
understanding of the request comment on this one or close it out?

  was:
Moved from todo.xml:

Now we rewrite parts of Lucene code in order to use another analyzer. It will 
be useful to select analyzer without touching code.

This was orginally request by Kazuhiro Kazama ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) in

http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=lucene-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgId=338928

Not sure if this was completed to Kazuhiro Kazama's satisfaction in the current 
CVS. We can certainly choose which analyzer to use for a given IndexWriter and 
QueryParser it sounded like he was asking for something like a factory the 
would create an analyzer based on a locale but unless I don't understand things 
quite right, searching an index with any analyzer that you didn't create the 
index with is bound to cause you to have false hits in your results.

Perhaps this is fixed or no action should be taken. Can someone with a better 
understanding of the request comment on this one or close it out?

    Environment: 
Operating System: other
Platform: Other

  was:
Operating System: other
Platform: Other

      Assign To:     (was: Lucene Developers)

> Selecting a language-specific analyzer according to a locale.
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: LUCENE-101
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-101
>      Project: Lucene - Java
>         Type: Improvement
>   Components: Analysis
>     Versions: unspecified
>  Environment: Operating System: other
> Platform: Other
>     Reporter: Eric Isakson
>     Priority: Minor

>
> Moved from todo.xml:
> Now we rewrite parts of Lucene code in order to use another analyzer. It will 
> be useful to select analyzer without touching code.
> This was orginally request by Kazuhiro Kazama ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) in
> http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=lucene-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgId=338928
> Not sure if this was completed to Kazuhiro Kazama's satisfaction in the 
> current 
> CVS. We can certainly choose which analyzer to use for a given IndexWriter 
> and 
> QueryParser it sounded like he was asking for something like a factory the 
> would create an analyzer based on a locale but unless I don't understand 
> things 
> quite right, searching an index with any analyzer that you didn't create the 
> index with is bound to cause you to have false hits in your results.
> Perhaps this is fixed or no action should be taken. Can someone with a better 
> understanding of the request comment on this one or close it out?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to