Hopefully that makes sense to someone besides just me. It's certainly a lot more complexity then a simple one to one mapping, but it seems to me like the flexability is worth spending the extra time to design/ build it.
Makes perfect sense to me, and it doesn't seem any more complex than what's been proposed before. Actually, this may be a quite straightforward, compact and extensible way of doing it all.
Though, I'd be careful with proposing a variety of equivalent syntaxes as it may easily lead to more confusion than good. Let's start with one canonical syntax. If desired, other (more pleasant) syntaxes may then be converted to that as part of a preprocessing step.
Wolfgang. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
