[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-330?page=comments#action_12368953 ]
Erik Hatcher commented on LUCENE-330: ------------------------------------- > Could you be more specific? The new TestFilteredQuery shows the details of the failure, with the stack trace in my last comment provided the patch I supplied. Those are all the specifics I have. > The patch contains my name as @author, could that be removed? Sure, no problem. I simply was true to the patch you provided earlier on in this issue, but I'd be happy to remove it if this patch gets committed. > [PATCH] Use filter bits for next() and skipTo() in FilteredQuery > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-330 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-330 > Project: Lucene - Java > Type: Improvement > Components: Search > Versions: CVS Nightly - Specify date in submission > Environment: Operating System: other > Platform: Other > Reporter: paul.elschot > Assignee: Lucene Developers > Priority: Minor > Attachments: FilteredQuery.java, FilteredQuery.java, FilteredQuery.java, > FilteredQuery.java, FilteredQueryPatch1.txt, IndexSearcherPatch2.txt, > SkipFilter.java, SkipFilter.java > > This improves performance of FilteredQuery by not calling score() > on documents that do not pass the filter. > This passes the current tests for FilteredQuery, but these tests > have not been adapted/extended. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
