This produces a "term out of order" exception:
doc.add(new Field("", "", Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED));
As the exception is quite confusing we should probably catch it earlier,
providing a better message. But would it be okay to disallow all empty
field names? If not, I'd at least like to throw an exception if both field
name and value are empty (null values do already produce a helpful
exception)
Regards
Daniel
--
http://www.danielnaber.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
