On 7/6/06, robert engels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I applied the patch, and made code changes to use it. It did not make any appreciable difference in performance over our current code
Yes, I'm not sure the performance comparisons made in the patch description are apples-to-apples. And hopefully the test wasn't against IndexModifier, which isn't built for speed at all. When one interleaves adds and deletes, it isn't the case that indexreaders and indexwriters need to be opened and closed each interleave.
(delete using IndexReader and then update the documents using IndexWriter - each document has a unique "key"). I attempted to evaluate the code on its own, but must admit that I got "lost" a bit.
I was left wondering if the extensive changes to IndexWriter were worth it, or if it was best left to something at a higher level (like a better IndexModifier, or something like what Solr does). -Yonik --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
