I did expect this kind of feedback for using db4o. I did use this product for a couple of times which does a good job. I was looking for a database storing the object representation easy an comfortable and this GPL product does provide that. The Gdata server won't go into production use for at least a while so this dual licence product will do the job for non commercial use. There are no restrictions or differences between the commercial and GPL version. There are two different storage implementations at the moment db4o and lucene and db4o can be used on distributed systems. I was not very keen to use berkley db for some reasons that's why i used db4o which did not take too long to build the little data access layer with db4o.
yours Simon On 7/26/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Out of curiosity - why db4o? Isn't that a commercial product? I see they have a GPL version now, although I don't see explanation of the dual license reasons/feature differecences/restrictions. Otis ----- Original Message ---- From: Simon Willnauer (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 11:40:13 AM Subject: [jira] Created: (LUCENE-631) GData Server - Milestone 3 Patch, Bugfixes, Documentation GData Server - Milestone 3 Patch, Bugfixes, Documentation --------------------------------------------------------- Key: LUCENE-631 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-631 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: New Feature Components: Other Reporter: Simon Willnauer Attachments: gdata_06_07_23.diff For Milestone 3 added Features: - Update Delete Concurrency - Version control - Second storage impl. based on Db4o. (Distributed Storage) - moved all configuration in one single config file. - removed dependencies in testcases. - added schema validation for and all xml files in the project (Configuration etc.) - added JavaDoc - much better Performance after reusing some resources - added recovering component to lucene based storage to recover entries after a server crash or OOM Error (very simple) - solved test case fail on hyperthread / multi core machines (@ hossman: give it a go) @Yonik && Doug could you get that stuff in the svn please regards simon -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
