: Even though I don't agree with this patch... 100ms is WAY TOO long : for a highly interactive index.
agreed. : > then, it is encouraging that similar retry logic is working for other : > projects, and that the retry is both rare and short. the examples of other projects I've seen mentioned are Ant (a command line user tool) and the Subversion server (A system that intrinsicly deals with network communication) ... both of these seem like situations where adding a bit of wait/retry logic doesn't add much overhead to the overall process -- i doubt either of those projects would be very happy if a low level API they used (say for example: an XML parsing library) employed similar wait/retry logic in a manner they couldn't control. Hence my suggestion about splitting this logic into a new Directory implementation: let the applications built on top of Lucene decide wether they want to protect themselves from this or not. -Hoss --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
