[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=comments#action_12436516 ] 
            
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-675:
----------------------------------------

Since this has dependencies, do you think we should put it under contrib?  I 
would be for a Performance directory and we could then organize it from there.  
Perhaps into packages for quantitative and qualitative performance.  

> Lucene benchmark: objective performance test for Lucene
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-675
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Andrzej Bialecki 
>         Attachments: LuceneBenchmark.java
>
>
> We need an objective way to measure the performance of Lucene, both indexing 
> and querying, on a known corpus. This issue is intended to collect comments 
> and patches implementing a suite of such benchmarking tests.
> Regarding the corpus: one of the widely used and freely available corpora is 
> the original Reuters collection, available from 
> http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.edu/project/theo-20/www/data/news20.tar.gz 
> or 
> http://people.csail.mit.edu/u/j/jrennie/public_html/20Newsgroups/20news-18828.tar.gz.
>  I propose to use this corpus as a base for benchmarks. The benchmarking 
> suite could automatically retrieve it from known locations, and cache it 
> locally.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to