And why would Lucene be doing that now? That just doesn't seem to be the right thing to do.
Yonik Seeley wrote: > > On 9/22/06, djd0383 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Also, I forgot to mention, but the error is throwing a message implying >> it >> cannot search on null. > > The analyzer you are using is throwing away the "1" leaving nothing > left to search on. > > -Yonik > http://incubator.apache.org/solr Solr, the open-source Lucene search > server > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Searching-with-%221%22-tf2320552.html#a6457067 Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
