: > : When custom Scorers and/or Directories need a close method, it can : > : also be provided by subclassing Scorer, IndexSearcher and Directory
: > it seems like that would handicap adoption of new Queries/Directories ... : > I don't know how many people would have been interested in : > ConstantScoreQuery or FunctionQuery if they'd been told they had to stop : > using IndexSearcher and start using a new "ConstantScorableIndexSearcher" : : Iirc no (general) closing method in Scorer or IndexSearcher was needed : for the Constant... and Function... queries and scorers. that's kind of side stepping my point: those classes gained popularity and use because they were easy to adopt -- they didn't have any complex dependencies, and could be droped into an existing Lucene application and be used without any other changes. If they *had* needed maintain resources, and that had forced the creation of custom IndexSearchers, no one would have ever tried them out -- hence my point that your suggested workarround would handicap the creation of new more complex Scorers and Directories. The bottom line is: 1) TermDocs has a close method 2) anything implimenting TermDocs should be able to trust that close() will be called 3) anything iterating over a TermDocs should call close() ...ergo: TermScorer needs a close() method, right? -Hoss --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]