[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-681?page=all ]
Otis Gospodnetic resolved LUCENE-681.
-------------------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
I think Jed's right. Plus, calling new Field(), which would now be possible,
would give us without the actual information about the field - name, value,
tokenized, stored, indexed, etc.
> org.apache.lucene.document.Field is Serializable but doesn't have default
> constructor
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-681
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-681
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Other
> Affects Versions: 1.9, 2.0.0, 2.1, 2.0.1
> Environment: doesn't depend on environment
> Reporter: Elijah Epifanov
> Priority: Critical
>
> when I try to pass Document via network or do anyhing involving
> serialization/deserialization I will get an exception.
> the following patch should help (Field.java):
> public Field () {
> }
> private void writeObject (java.io.ObjectOutputStream out)
> throws IOException {
> out.defaultWriteObject ();
> }
> private void readObject (java.io.ObjectInputStream in)
> throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
> in.defaultReadObject ();
> if (name == null) {
> throw new NullPointerException ("name cannot be null");
> }
> this.name = name.intern (); // field names are interned
> }
> Maybe other classes do not conform to Serialization requirements too...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
