Yes legal-discuss might be the best way to get a concrete answer. I will discuss that as soon as I got back from the US.
best regards simon On 12/13/06, Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Probably best to go to legal-discuss. I think the "non-transferable" restriction in section 2 will be an issue. http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html Dan. Simon Willnauer wrote: > There your go: > http://www.db4o.com/about/company/legalpolicies/docl.aspx > > thanks simon > > On 12/13/06, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What are the licensing terms? >> >> -Brian >> >> On Dec 13, 2006, at 11:31 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote: >> >> > Hello all, >> > >> > two weeks ago I met the DB4O CEO at the DB4O roadshow in Berlin. We >> > talked about gdata, lucene and the license nightmare. Two days later I >> > got an email that db4o will release a third license to allow projects >> > like lucene to closely-distribute the db4o binaries and source. I did >> > receive the licence today. So here goes the question.. Do I have to >> > talk to some ASF officials / lawyers about that stuff or should I just >> > add the license text and jar to the svn. >> > >> > Currently I just got an PDF license document should I send this to the >> > list at all?! >> > >> > best regards Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
