On 1/19/07, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think we should hold up 2.1 for this. First, I'm not sure how
long it will take me to finish (I have a baby due in 23 days which is
making me very nervous!), and second I think we have alot of good stuff
already in the trunk to make up a solid 2.1 release.
I do think we should try to get LUCENE-565 into 2.1 (it is independent
of LUCENE-710)? I think it's a great step towards our "use
IndexWriter to make changes; use IndexReader for reading" goal and
would greatly reduce user confusion.
Of course this is really the decision of the Release Manager once we
get a volunteer :)
I could do the release mechanics, but IMO, it's a community decision
on what goes in and when to make a release.
If we make releases a little more often, I don't think the decision of
what to put in should be based as much as what's useful as much as
what we want to change or take out before a formal release. What
would be harder to improve in the future, what would be harder to
support in the future, is the API and the Index format in a place you
feel comfortable with seeing around for a while, etc.
-Yonik
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
