Steven Parkes wrote:
> I was thinking of rune ...
On second look, the SourceForge Rune project appears to be defunct (no
activity AFAICT since 2001). And there is a note from 2001 at
<http://www.worldvista.org/Conferences/Past_Events> that seems to
confirm this:
Rune Development Group Meeting:
Oakland Federal Building, Oakland, California, USA
Work on object-oriented (OO) extensions to Standard MUMPS,
decision to set aside OO work to create OpenVistA.
sponsor: MUMPS Development Committee
(Five out of six of the Rune project developers are now developers on
the OpenVistA sourceforge project.)
So, I think that as long as "Rune" never referred to an actual product,
and it's not being actively used, why not use it?
Steve
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Steven Rowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 7:19 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: jruby anyone?
>>
>> More absotasticisms for you, Steven:
>>
>> bruce
>> loose rubies
>> rubarb
>> rue bleu
>> ruble
>> rubble
>> ruly
>> blur(ry)
>> kerosene
>> carbine
>> jewelry
>> jellyroll
>> morton
>>
>> :)
>>
>> Erik Hatcher wrote:
>>> On Jan 21, 2007, at 9:08 PM, Steven Parkes wrote:
>>>> You know, I hate naming things. Anybody have any violent problems
>> with
>>>> rubric?
>>> already taken: http://rubric.rubyforge.org/
>>>
>>> sorry, i don't have any suggestions at the moment. dreaming up solr
>>> "flare" tapped me out :)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
