[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12483738
 ] 

Steven Parkes commented on LUCENE-846:
--------------------------------------

Dang. It used to fail but I've made some updates since then that would change 
the merge policy (fancy that) and it's no longer happening.

Let me see if I have a snapshot lying around that has the old code where it 
still happens.

[As as aside, I've been thinking of looking into svk or brz (or whatever its 
called) that would allow me to version control stuff without it going into svn. 
All of a sudden I can see why the linux folks like distributed version control 
...]

> IOExeception can cause loss of data due to premature segment deletion
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-846
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-846
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Index
>            Reporter: Steven Parkes
>         Assigned To: Michael McCandless
>
> If you hit an IOException, e.g., disk full, while making a cfs from its 
> constituent parts, you may not be able to rollback to the before-merge 
> process. This happens via addIndexes.
> I don't have a nice easy test for this; generating IOEs ain't so easy. But it 
> does happen in the patch for the factored merge policy with the existing 
> tests because the pseudo-randomly generated IOEs fall in a different place.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to