"Ning Li" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/26/07, Michael McCandless (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ahhh, this is a very good point. OK I won't deprecate "flushing by > > doc count" and instead will allow either "flush by RAM usage" (default > > to this?) or "flush by doc count". > > Just want to clarify: It's either "flush and merge by byte size" or > "flush and merge by doc count", right?
Good point, to keep the doc IDs identical, the merge policy must also be identical. But I think we should still default to "flush by RAM usage" and "merge by segment size"? And then developers who rely on doc IDs to follow a specific controlled pattern (eg for ParallelReader) would set the writer to flush by doc count and then set it to the "by doc count" merge policy. Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
