[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12489187
 ] 

Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-736:
-----------------------------------------

Doron, sounds like this is ripe for a commit now to take care of both this and 
LUCENE-697.


> Sloppy Phrase Scoring Misbehavior
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-736
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-736
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Search
>            Reporter: Doron Cohen
>         Assigned To: Doron Cohen
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: perf-search-new.log, perf-search-orig.log, 
> res-search-new2.log, res-search-orig2.log, sloppy_phrase.patch2.txt, 
> sloppy_phrase.patch3.txt, sloppy_phrase_java.patch.txt, 
> sloppy_phrase_tests.patch.txt
>
>
> This is an extension of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-697
> In addition to abnormalities Yonik pointed out in 697, there seem to be other 
> issues with slopy phrase search and scoring.
> 1) A phrase with a repeated word would be detected in a document although it 
> is not there.
> I.e. document = A B D C E , query = "B C B" would not find this document (as 
> expected), but query "B C B"~2 would find it. 
> I think that no matter how large the slop is, this document should not be a 
> match.
> 2) A document containing both orders of a query, symmetrically, would score 
> differently for the queru and for its reveresed form.
> I.e. document = A B C B A would score differently for queries "B C"~2 and "C 
> B"~2, although it is symmetric to both.
> I will attach test cases that show both these problems and the one reported 
> by Yonik in 697. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to