Antony Bowesman wrote: > Another use this may have is that mini-optimize operations could be > done at more > regular intervals to reduce the time for a full optimize. I could > then schedule > mini-optimise to run for a couple of minutes at more frequent intervals.
This seems to assume the proposed feature allows to continue an interrupted merge at a later time, from where it was stopped. But if I understood correctly then the proposed feature does not work this way - so all the (uncommitted) work done until shutdown will be "lost" - i.e. next merge() would start from scratch. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
