Hmmm, it is all nicely packaged in source, which satisfies the
discussion you listed below. As for the binary distributions, they
are pretty much worthless unless you have some way of knowing what
the dependencies are, right? Or am I missing something?
On Jun 6, 2007, at 5:45 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: I feel like I am forgetting something with all the emails flying
: around about packaging, but don't the contrib jars also need their
: libs packaged with them in the binary distribution? Or at least a
: way to specify what they are and where to get them? They are there
: in the source distribution.
This was discussed back during the 2.1 release - but there the
focus was
on making the contribs in the src-dist compilable ... there wasn't
much
discussion about dependencies for the binary dist.
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--release-Lucene-2.1-
tf3228536.html#a8981287
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--release-Lucene-2.1-
tf3228536.html#a8980616
-Hoss
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
