[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12507093
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-937:
--------------------------------------
> If you decide to keep things as they are I will have to roll an
> alternate CachingTokenFilter for my Highlighter (no problem of
> course <g>).
I'm certainly up to make a change here if it improves performance
significantly (and yes, 43% is significant). I just want to be
sure that we don't optimize a special case. So yes, it would be
great if you could vary the parameters in your tests.
Btw. which JVM version are you using?
> Make CachingTokenFilter faster
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-937
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-937
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Mark Miller
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: CachingTokenFilter.patch
>
>
> The wrong data structure was used for the CachingTokenFilter. It should be an
> ArrayList rather than a LinkedList. There is a noticeable difference in speed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
