[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12507093 ]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-937: -------------------------------------- > If you decide to keep things as they are I will have to roll an > alternate CachingTokenFilter for my Highlighter (no problem of > course <g>). I'm certainly up to make a change here if it improves performance significantly (and yes, 43% is significant). I just want to be sure that we don't optimize a special case. So yes, it would be great if you could vary the parameters in your tests. Btw. which JVM version are you using? > Make CachingTokenFilter faster > ------------------------------ > > Key: LUCENE-937 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-937 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Mark Miller > Priority: Minor > Attachments: CachingTokenFilter.patch > > > The wrong data structure was used for the CachingTokenFilter. It should be an > ArrayList rather than a LinkedList. There is a noticeable difference in speed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]