"Doron Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Michael McCandless" wrote: > > > boolean next(Token resToken) > > > > which returns true if it has updated resToken with another token, > > else false if end-of-stream was hit. > > I would actually prefer > Token next(Token resToken) > because: > - this was the API with reuse is very much like the one without reuse > (except for the reusable param) - easier for app dev. > - it allows to return useful result also in cases where the specific > implementation does not support reuse, or null was passed (indicating > reuse > is not desired), or something in the data/state inhibited reuse.
I see. So the callee is allowed to return a different token than resToken? Ie passing "resToken" is just a suggestion that you may use resToken to return your result but you are not required to. OK I'll try this approach... Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
