Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 8/31/07, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If each document has an indexed id field in both indexes, then you could
simply use a FieldCache of that id field in each index to determine the
mapping.
I've thought about this approach, but I think it has some scalability issues...
It seems like the re-mapped ids from the secondary index would be
out-of-order, and thus would require caching & sorting of both ids and
scores from that index.
Thanks for the input - for now I gave up on this, after discovering that
I would have no way to ensure in skipTo() that document id-s are
monotonically increasing (which seems to be a part of the contract).
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
