[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-1058: ------------------------------------ Attachment: LUCENE-1058.patch Whew. I think we are there and I like it! I renamed Yonik's suggestions to be SinkTokenizer and SourceTokenFilter to model the whole source/sink notion. Hopefully people won't think the SourceTokenFilter is for processing code. :-) I will commit tomorrow if there are no objections. > New Analyzer for buffering tokens > --------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1058 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1058 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Analysis > Reporter: Grant Ingersoll > Assignee: Grant Ingersoll > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.3 > > Attachments: LUCENE-1058.patch, LUCENE-1058.patch, LUCENE-1058.patch, > LUCENE-1058.patch, LUCENE-1058.patch, LUCENE-1058.patch > > > In some cases, it would be handy to have Analyzer/Tokenizer/TokenFilters that > could siphon off certain tokens and store them in a buffer to be used later > in the processing pipeline. > For example, if you want to have two fields, one lowercased and one not, but > all the other analysis is the same, then you could save off the tokens to be > output for a different field. > Patch to follow, but I am still not sure about a couple of things, mostly how > it plays with the new reuse API. > See > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/54397?search_string=BufferingAnalyzer;#54397 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]