[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12558407#action_12558407
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-652:
----------------------------------------
Implementing this would mean deprecating Field.Store.COMPRESS and the various
other places that use/set bits marking a field as compressed.
Seems like a reasonable thing to do. I will mark this as a 2.9 issue, so that
we make sure we deprecate it at or before that time.
> Compressed fields should be "externalized" (from Fields into Document)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-652
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-652
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Index
> Affects Versions: 1.9, 2.0.0, 2.0.1, 2.1
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.9
>
>
> Right now, as of 2.0 release, Lucene supports compressed stored fields.
> However, after discussion on java-dev, the suggestion arose, from Robert
> Engels, that it would be better if this logic were moved into the Document
> level. This way the indexing level just stores opaque binary fields, and
> then Document handles compress/uncompressing as needed.
> This approach would have prevented issues like LUCENE-629 because merging of
> segments would never need to decompress.
> See this thread for the recent discussion:
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/38836
> When we do this we should also work on related issue LUCENE-648.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
